![]() ![]() There are some minor gains in games like Red Dead Redemption 2, but CPU-limited games vastly favor AMD’s processor. ![]() You can see our results below, using the same test bench as the above section. The Ryzen 9 7950X3D proves that, vastly outpacing the Core i9-13900K in basically every game we tested. If AMD’s last-gen Ryzen 7 5800X3D taught us anything, it’s that 3D V-Cache is built for gaming. The Ryzen 9 7950X3D holds up well, but the extra cost mostly comes down to gaming performance, not productivity. It slips slightly to AMD in a few tasks, but the Core i9-13900K is anywhere from $100 to $150 cheaper as well. Still, Intel holds the lead in raw productivity performance. Although the applications are slim, AMD’s 3D V-Cache can go beyond gaming. This boost could come from the additional cache on the Ryzen 9 7950X3D, as calculating Pi is an intensive task for RAM. Similarly, AMD took the lead in Y-Cruncher, where we leveraged the processors to calculate 500 million digits of Pi. Remember, the Core i9-13900K has more cores than the Ryzen 9 7950X3D, but AMD’s chip has performant cores. The Ryzen 9 7950X3D held a slight lead in Blender, for example, largely on the back of having more powerful cores. It’s not a flat-out win for Intel’s processor, though. Content creators are better off with the Core i9-13900K, mostly due to its higher overall boost clock speeds (it can easily reach 6GHz) and its higher core count. Cinebench shows it ahead in single-core and multi-core speed, which is further backed up by real-world benchmarks such as PugetBench for Photoshop and faster transcoding times in Handbrake. Overall, the Core i9-13900K has a lead in productivity performance. Y-Cruncher single core (seconds, lower is better) Y-Cruncher multi-core (seconds, lower is better) All tests were run with 32GB of DDR5-6000 memory, along with Nvidia’s RTX 4080 GPU. We tested the Core i9-13900K and Ryzen 9 7950X3D in a variety of benchmarks, and you can see our results below. The AMD chip has a massive 144MB of combined cache, all thanks to the architecture of AMD’s 3D chips. Intel boosted the cache on Raptor Lake CPUs by a large amount, but it’s still no match for the 3D V-Cache-powered Ryzen 9 7950X3D. Lastly, there’s the difference in cache size. The processors are very similar in terms of power consumption, but the Core i9-13900K can be boosted to a whopping 253 watts. Ultimately, it has a higher core count than the Ryzen 9 7950X3D, but the same number of threads.ĪMD’s CPU has a significantly higher base clock and a slightly lower boost clock than the Intel chip. Looking at the specifications of both CPUs reveals a fair number of differences between the two.įor one, the Intel Core i9-13900K sports Intel’s hybrid core architecture, meaning it has a mix of performance (P) and efficiency (E) cores. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |